AJP Legacy Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 231: 434-440, 1976;
0002-9513/76 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karim, F
Right arrow Articles by Hainsworth, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karim, F
Right arrow Articles by Hainsworth, R
American Journal of Physiology, Vol 231, Issue 2, 434-440
Copyright © 1976 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Responses of abdominal vascular capacitance to stimulation of splachnic nerves

F Karim and R Hainsworth

In chloralose-anesthetized dogs the abdominal circulation was vascularly isolated without opening the abdominal cavity. The region was perfused at constant flow through the aorta and drained at constant pressure from the inferior vena cava. Changes in resistance were calculated from changes in perfusion pressure and changes in capacitance were calculated by integrating changes in venous outflow. Stimulation of both splanchnic nerves at 20 Hz increased resistance by 135% and reduced capacitance by 7.20 ml kg-1. The capacitance responses at 1 and 2 Hz (3.42 and 5.43 ml kg-1) were 48 and 67% of the responses at 20 Hz, However, the resistance responses at 1 and 2 Hz (14 and 31% increase) were only 12 and 26% of the responses at 20 Hz. After occlusion of the splenic pedicle, capacitance responses were reduced by about 40%. Although changes in inferior vena caval pressure changed the volume of blood in the abdomen by 0.92 ml kg-1 cmH2O-1, the responses to stimulation were relatively constant in any one animal at constant venous pressures between 5 and 15 cmH2O.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. Hainsworth and M. J. Drinkhill
COUNTERPOINT: ACTIVE VENOCONSTRICTION IS NOT IMPORTANT IN MAINTAINING OR RAISING END-DIASTOLIC VOLUME AND STROKE VOLUME DURING EXERCISE AND ORTHOSTASIS
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1264 - 1265.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
REBUTTAL FROM DR. ROTHE
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1265 - 1266.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
REBUTTAL FROM DRS. HAINSWORTH AND DRINKHILL
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1266 - 1266.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. P. Arbeille, S. S. Besnard, P. P. Kerbeci, and D. M. Mohty
Portal vein cross-sectional area and flow and orthostatic tolerance: a 90-day bed rest study.
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2005; 99(5): 1853 - 1857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1976 by the American Physiological Society.