AJP Legacy Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 228: 1927-1935, 1975;
0002-9513/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blantz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blantz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, B.
American Journal of Physiology, Vol 228, Issue 6, 1927-1935
Copyright © 1975 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Determinants of peritubular capillary fluid uptake in hydropenia and saline and plasma expansion

RC Blantz and BJ Tucker

Hydrostatic (HPc) and oncotic (phic) pressures within the peritubular capillary, tubular pressure (Pt), nephron filtration rate, and plasma flow, and proximal fractional and absolute reabsorption (APR) were measured in anesthetized rats during hydropenia and plasma and saline expansion. Net interstitial pressure (phii-HPi) was estimated from subcapsular hydrostatic and oncotic pressures during saline expansion and these data were applied to a mathematical model of peritubular capillary fluid uptake to determine the profile of effective reabsorption pressure (ERP) with distance (x*) alongthe capillary and calculate the peritubular capillary permeability coefficient (LpAr). ERPX* = (PHIC MINUS HPC)X* MINUS (PHII MINUS HPi) and APR = ERPX*LpAr.During saline expansion phii minus HPi was -12.1 plus or minus 0.8 mmHg and ERP,3.8 mm. The LpAr was 0.07 nl/s per g KW per mmHg, and this value was applied to hypropenia and plasma expansion to determine ERP and phii minus HPi. The phiiminus HPi was +6.0 and +5.0 mmHg, respectively, and ERP was 4.1 and 3.5 mmHg.Efective reabsorptive pressure remained positive along x* in all states, and phii minus HPi correlated best changes in phic and poorly with changes in efferent plasma flow. The APR did not correlate with either calculated phii minus HPi or the transepithelial driving pressure, Pt + phii minus HPi.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1975 by the American Physiological Society.