AJP Legacy Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 206: 1189-1195, 1964;
0002-9513/64 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stern, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rapaport, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stern, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rapaport, E.

Reflex pulmonary vasoconstriction due to stimulation of the aortic body by nicotine

Shlomo Stern 1, Richard E. Ferguson 1, and Elliot Rapaport 1

1 Cardiovascular Research Institute and Department of Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, and Cardiopulmonary Laboratory, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California

To study the hemodynamic effects of stimulation of the aortic and carotid body chemoreceptors, we injected 2.5– 20 µg/kg nicotine into the ascending aorta of anesthetized, artificially ventilated open-chest dogs. Pressures in the pulmonary artery, left atrium, and systemic arteries, and the stroke output of the right ventricle were measured simultaneously. Pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances (PVR, SVR) were calculated. Changes began 1.5–3.0 sec after the injection; the following two 5-sec periods were compared to a 5-sec control period immediately preceding injection. The injection of nicotine was followed by a significant reflex rise in PVR; the sensory receptors for the reflex were aortic chemoreceptors and the efferent paths were sympathetic fibers. Similar effects were not elicited by stimulation of the carotid body. Bronchoconstriction, changes in bronchial flow, shifts of blood volume between the vascular beds, and liberation of catecholamine were excluded as factors in the PVR increase. Bradycardia, increased SVR, and decreased flow also occurred after combined stimulation of the aortic and carotid chemoreceptors; however, when bradycardia was prevented by atropinization, no significant change in flow occurred.

Key Words: chemoreceptor stimulation • electromagnetic flowmeter • efferent sympathetic fibers

Submitted on September 9, 1963







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1964 by the American Physiological Society.