AJP Legacy Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 206: 492-498, 1964;
0002-9513/64 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vander, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vander, A. J.

Effect of acetylcholine, atropine, and physostigmine on renal function in the dog

Arthur J. Vander 1

1 Department of Physiology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Acetylcholine (1–500 µg/min), atropine (.002–.12 mg/kg min), or physostigmine (.01–.08 mg/min) was infused directly into the left renal artery of anesthetized dogs, and right and left kidney functions were compared. Acetylcholine produced variable changes in glomerular filtration rate (–30 to +55%), but always increased renal plasma flow (4–115%), sodium excretion (20–365 µm/min), potassium excretion (1–56 µm/min), and urine volume (.25–3.1 ml/min). Filtration fraction, urine osmolality, and medullary sodium concentration were always reduced. These changes could all be reversed or prevented by atropine. Stop-flow studies failed to demonstrate any distal tubular inhibition of sodium reabsorption by acetylcholine. Neither atropine nor physostigmine, when infused into the renal artery by itself, produced any changes in renal hemodynamics or electrolyte excretion. These data demonstrate that acetylcholine can decrease renal arteriolar resistance and inhibit tubular sodium reabsorption. They also provide indirect evidence which supports, but does not prove, the hypothesis that the kidney lacks parasympathetic innervation.

Key Words: cholinesterase inhibitors • renal circulation • renal electrolyte excretion • renal countercurrent system renal innervation

Submitted on June 14, 1963




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Ayer, V. Antic, A. G. Dulloo, B. N. Van Vliet, and J.-P. Montani
Hemodynamic consequences of chronic parasympathetic blockade with a peripheral muscarinic antagonist
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H1265 - H1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1964 by the American Physiological Society.