AJP Legacy AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 206: 255-261, 1964;
0002-9513/64 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaeppi, U.
Right arrow Articles by Koella, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaeppi, U.
Right arrow Articles by Koella, W. P.

Reaction of isolated pig iris sphincter to electrical stimulation and acetylcholine

U. Schaeppi 1 and W. P. Koella 1

1 Laboratory of Neurophysiology and Neuropharmacology, Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, Shrewsbury, Massachusetts

The isolated iris ring of the pig irrigated with Tyrode's solution was suspended on two platinum hooks which served as stimulating electrodes. Isometric contractions of the iris sphincter were elicited by injections of acetylcholine (ACh) into the bathing medium or by short periods of electrical stimulation. The results obtained with atropine, Prostigmine, diisopropylfluorophosphate and Xylocaine suggested that electrical stimulation produced sphincter contractions indirectly, i.e., via activation of postganglionic nerve fibers and release of ACh. The effects of electric stimulation or of administration of ACh differed in many respects from those induced by stretch. A dose of atropine or iodoacetate which prevented the effect of the former two procedures did not attenuate the latter. Stretch enhanced the reactivity to injections of ACh and electrical stimulation; continuous administration of ACh initially increased and then decreased the contractile responses to strong electrical stimuli or single superimposed injections of ACh. Prolonged electrical stimulation usually decreased the effect of superimposed administration of ACh.

Note:
With the Technical Assistance of Myrna Dodd

Key Words: contraction pig iris sphincter • electrically induced contraction • indirect nature of electrically induced contraction • atropine • neostigmine • DFP • hexamethonium • nicotine • lidocaine

Submitted on July 18, 1963







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1964 by the American Physiological Society.