AJP Legacy AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 204: 304-308, 1963;
0002-9513/63 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peters, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vonderahe, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peters, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vonderahe, A. R.

Influence of photic stimulation and hypothermia on the electromyogram of the developing chick

Joseph J. Peters 1, Charles J. Cusick 1, and Alphonse R. Vonderahe 1

1 Department of Biology, Xavier University, and Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

As the body temperature of developing chicks between the 18th day of incubation and the 3rd week after hatching was lowered from normal to 16 C, the eye was subjected to photic stimulation and electrical recordings were made from the eye, cerebral lobes, and shank muscles. As body temperature drops photic stimulation modifies the amplitude of muscle potentials by first producing reduction in amplitude (35–25 C), then brief augmentation (20–24 C), then prolonged augmentation (20–16 C), first, with the onset of photic stimulation and later with the cessation of photic stimulation. These effects are most pronounced in chicks between the 20th day of incubation and 1 week after hatching.

Submitted on July 28, 1962







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1963 by the American Physiological Society.