AJP Legacy information about EB 2010 Anaheim
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 203: 359-365, 1962;
0002-9513/62 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Battersby, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wagman, I. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Battersby, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wagman, I. H.

Neural limitations of visual excitability. IV: spatial determinants of retrochiasmal interaction

William S. Battersby 1 and Irving H. Wagman 1

1 Department of Neurology, Mt. Sinai Hospital, New York City

Visual excitability changes were obtained from two trained observers by measuring threshold with a test flash of light at varying temporal intervals from a supraliminal conditioning flash. In monocular observation the two flashes were presented to the same eye; in binocular observation the conditioning flash was exposed to one eye and the test to the homonymous location in the other eye. The conditioning target size was varied while the concentrically placed test flash was held constant. In all instances, threshold rose when test preceded conditioning flash in time, reaching a maximum at about a o-msec interval. As test flash was progressively delayed with respect to conditioning flash onset, thresholds fell to an asymptote, returning to resting level only after termination of the conditioning flash. Both monocularly and binocularly, an increase in the magnitude of threshold rise was produced by making the conditioning target smaller, the greatest proportionate effect being obtained binocularly. These findings indicate that central (retrochiasmal) processes are critical with respect to spatial interaction in the visual system, a conclusion compatible with recent studies on the cortical receptor field.

Submitted on November 16, 1961




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
W. S. Battersby and I. H. Wagman
Light Adaptation Kinetics: The Influence of Spatial Factors
Science, March 6, 1964; 143(3610): 1029 - 1031.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. L. Macknik, S. Martinez-Conde, and M. M. Haglund
The role of spatiotemporal edges in visibility and visual masking
PNAS, June 20, 2000; 97(13): 7556 - 7560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1962 by the American Physiological Society.