AJP Legacy Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 202: 487-490, 1962;
0002-9513/62 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, C. McC.
Right arrow Articles by Lange, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, C. McC.
Right arrow Articles by Lange, G.

Reactions of neurons in or near the supraoptic nuclei

Chandler McC. Brooks 1, J. Ushiyama 1, and Gertrude Lange 1

1 Department of Physiology, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York

The reactions of neurons within or near the supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus to a variety of "stimuli" were studied. A few neurons were found to be excited by stimulation of muscle afferents. Other neurons were inhibited by stimulation of gastrocnemius and tibialis nerve fibers. Stimulation of the vagus nerve activated some neurons and inhibited a few but, as in the case of muscle nerve stimulation, the vast majority of neurons were unaffected. Stimulation of midbrain and pontine reticular formation inhibited some neurons and activated others. Intracarotid injections of isotonic saline had no effect on neuron discharge but low concentrations of glucose augmented neuron firing as did hypertonic NaCl. Distilled water reduced neuron activity. Epinephrine, norepinephrine, and acetylcholine accelerated neuron firing; atropine was without effect in concentrations employed. Responses to injected materials developed more slowly and lasted longer than did effects of nerve stimulations. Some neurons were affected by several of the stimuli employed but the majority of neurons were unresponsive during the periods of recording which could be maintained.

Submitted on September 6, 1961




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. L. Barker, J. W. Crayton, and R. A. Nicoll
Supraoptic Neurosecretory Cells: Autonomic Modulation
Science, January 15, 1971; 171(3967): 206 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. Yagi, T. Azuma, and K. Matsuda
Neurosecretory Cell: Capable of Conducting Impulse in Rats
Science, November 11, 1966; 154(3750): 778 - 779.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1962 by the American Physiological Society.