AJP Legacy AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 202: 17-20, 1962;
0002-9513/62 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Headings, V. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rondell, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Headings, V. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rondell, P. A.

Arterial muscle contraction and potassium movement in vitro

Verle E. Headings 1 and Paul A. Rondell 1

1 Department of Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Rings of dog carotid 2–3 mm in width were placed in a physiological salt solution, equilibrated, under 1 g of tension, at 37 C for 2 hr and were then stimulated electrically or with epinephrine, or norepinephrine. Tension development was recorded. At given time intervals following stimulation, rings were removed and analyzed for potassium content. Maximum loss of potassium, averaging 10% of original content, occurred 5–15 min after electrical stimulation. After stimulation by either epinephrine or norepinephrine a consistent slight increase in potassium content occurred. Thus net potassium efflux (and membrane depolarization?) is not an essential part of vascular muscle contraction in response to catecholamine stimulation. The reported loss of potassium from artery wall following catecholamine stimulation in vivo suggests another, perhaps indirect, action of these agents.

Submitted on July 18, 1961







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1962 by the American Physiological Society.