AJP Legacy Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 201: 462-466, 1961;
0002-9513/61 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abboud, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pereda, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abboud, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pereda, S. A.

Acute hemodynamic responses to intravenous and intra-arterial guanethidine

Francois M. Abboud 1, John W. Eckstein 1, and Santiago A. Pereda 1

1 Hemodynamic Laboratory, Cardiovascular Research Laboratories, Department of Internal Medicine, State University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa

Intravenous administration of guanethidine to dogs causes an abrupt fall in systemic arterial pressure which is followed by a sustained increase. These studies were made to determine the nature of this biphasic response. Observations were made on dogs before and at frequent intervals after guanethidine was given. A fall in arterial pressure, an increase in cardiac output, and a decrease in peripheral resistance were observed within 10 sec; these changes lasted 40–50 sec. After the depressor phase, blood pressure and stroke volume increased while resistance returned to control levels. These acute changes subsided within 10–15 min. Ganglionic blockade augmented the pressor response and adrenergic blockade reduced it. Intra-arterial injection of guanethidine into perfused denervated forelegs caused brief vasodilatation followed by vasoconstriction. This response was qualitatively different from that seen with intra-arterial injection of norepinephrine. The results support indirectly the hypothesis that the systemic pressor response is caused by circulating catecholamines. The results demonstrate also that the drug has a local vasodilator action on the blood vessels of the foreleg.

Submitted on March 20, 1961







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1961 by the American Physiological Society.