AJP Legacy  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 199: 553-559, 1960;
0002-9513/60 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burnstock, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prosser, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burnstock, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prosser, C. L.

Conduction in smooth muscles: comparative electrical properties

Geoffrey Burnstock 1 and C. L. Prosser 1

1 Physiology Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois

Electrical and morphological properties were correlated in a variety of mammalian smooth muscles. In the sucrose gap electrode the gut muscles (esophagus muscularis mucosae, intestinal muscles and taenia coli) showed small slow waves (5 mv) and spikes (25–45 mv), while dog retractor penis and rat ureter gave spikes up to 110 mv. Membrane depolarization with K2SO4 was 50–72 mv in both groups of muscle; with KCl it was one-third less. Conduction velocity ranged from 15 cm/sec. for esophagus muscle to 4.1 for intestinal muscles and 1.6 cm/sec. for retractor penis. Resistance of 0.5-mm strips in the sucrose gap was approximately 1 megohm for propagating visceral muscles, 5–12 megohms for nonpropagating blood vessel muscles. Fast conduction is correlated with low resistance and high capacitance (in sucrose), brief spikes, short relative refractory periods, low threshold stimulus duration, long fibers and low interfiber spaces (close packing of cells). Conduction required many parallel fibers; it failed in strips less than about 100 µ diameter and conduction distance varied with excitability. The electrical unit is the individual fiber, but the conducting unit involves many fibers. Conduction appears to depend on relatively low resistance paths of parallel fibers which interact electrically. It also depends on excitability of individual cells which is kept high by stretch and chemical agents.

Submitted on February 15, 1960




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. Kent Hermsmeyer and T. L. Thompson
Vasodilator coordination via membrane conduction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1320 - H1321.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
K.-H. Kuo and C. Y. Seow
Contractile filament architecture and force transmission in swine airway smooth muscle
J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2004; 117(8): 1503 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1960 by the American Physiological Society.