AJP Legacy Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 199: 381-386, 1960;
0002-9513/60 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koella, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Czicman, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koella, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Czicman, J. S.

Modulatory influence on cerebral cortical optic response from the carotid sinus area

Werner P. Koella 1, John R. Smythies 1, Charles K. Levy 1, and John S. Czicman 1

1 Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, Shrewsbury, Massachusetts

We have previously shown that serotonin injected intracarotidly exerts its effect on the cerebral evoked response through at least three receptor fields: the carotid sinus (factor X), the brain stem (Y) and the specific sensory synapses (Z). To demonstrate factor X directly, Dial-anesthetized cats were prepared for recording of the cortical visual response. The normally innervated carotid sinus area was isolated from the circulation and cannulated for perfusion with Ringer's solution. Depending upon the dose, serotonin added to the perfusion fluid induced enhancement or reduction of the amplitude of the evoked response. With doses ranging from 0.019 to 10.0 µg a dose-response curve similar to the one calculated in the previous series was found. Also, the time course of the changes in potential amplitude was similar to the one in the previous series. In order to match in this way the results of the present and the previous series a correcting factor of approximately 32 had to be introduced; for example the effect produced by 10.0 µg in the previous series was similar to the one induced by 0.3125 µg in the present series. This divergence is plausibly explained on the basis of the different perfusion rate used in the two series.

Submitted on March 2, 1960







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1960 by the American Physiological Society.