AJP Legacy Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 198: 161-168, 1960;
0002-9513/60 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haddy, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haddy, F. J.

Effect of histamine on small and large vessel pressures in the dog foreleg

Francis J. Haddy 1

1 Departments of Physiology and Medicine, Northwestern University; and Veterans Administration Research Hospital, Chicago, Illinois

In order to determine how histamine raises small venous pressure in the dog foreleg, response of pressure during spontaneous blood flow was compared with that during constan blood flow. With spontaneous blood flow, small venous pressure rose in response to both slow and fast rates of infusion of histamine into the brachial artery. Rise of small venous pressure preceded rise of interstitial pressure. Edema appeared whenever small venous pressure exceeded 26 mm Hg for 7 minutes or more. With blood flow held constant, slow rates of infusion failed to either raise small venous pressure or produce edema. Pressure rose and edema appeared despite a constant blood flow rate when the rate of infusion was increased to values which lowered systemic arterial pressure. Pressure increase was unaffected by section of foreleg nerves but was partially abolished by adrenergic blockade. Rapid intravenous infusion during constant blood flow raised small venous pressure much less and this rise was completely abolished by adrenergic blockade. These studies indicate that low rates of infusion into the brachial artery raise small venous pressure by arteriolar dilatation whereas high rates raise this pressure both by arteriolar dilatation and venous constriction. Venous constriction probably results both from a direct action of histamine and indirectly through an adrenal discharge. The study also suggests that elevation of capillary hydrostatic pressure is an adequate explanation for histamine edema.

Submitted on March 30, 1959







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1960 by the American Physiological Society.