AJP Legacy Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 196: 1008-1014, 1959;
0002-9513/59 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guyton, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fairchild, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guyton, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fairchild, H. M.

Relative importance of venous and arterial resistances in controlling venous return and cardiac output

Arthur C. Guyton 1, Berry Abernathy 1, Jimmy B. Langston 1, Berwind N. Kaufmann 1, and Hilton M. Fairchild 1

1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson, Mississippi

In dogs with cardiovascular reflexes completely blocked by total spinal anesthesia, the total peripheral resistance was increased five- or more fold in two ways: first, by injecting small plastic microspheres into the arteries, thereby increasing the arterial resistance, and, second, by inflating pneumatic cuffs around the major veins, thereby increasing venous resistance. A small increase in venous resistance decreased cardiac output eight times as much as an increase in arterial resistance of similar magnitude. This difference was caused principally by a) a marked rise in systemic arterial pressure when arterial resistance was increased; this maintained the cardiac output at almost normal levels and b) a fall in systemic arterial pressure when venous resistance was increased; this promoted even more fall in cardiac output than increased total peripheral resistance alone would have caused.

Submitted on August 11, 1958




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
D. Curran-Everett
A classic learning opportunity from Arthur Guyton and colleagues (1955): circuit analysis of venous return
Advan Physiol Educ, June 1, 2007; 31(2): 129 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Martini, A. G. Tsai, P. Cabrales, P. C. Johnson, and M. Intaglietta
Increased cardiac output and microvascular blood flow during mild hemoconcentration in hamster window model
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H310 - H317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. Mace, P. Dervanian, M. Weiss, J.-P. Daniel, J. Losay, and J.-Y. Neveux
Hemodynamics of Different Degrees of Right Heart Bypass: Experimental Assessment
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1995; 60(5): 1230 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1959 by the American Physiological Society.