AJP Legacy Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 187: 207-223, 1956;
0002-9513/56 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guth, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Style, C. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guth, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Style, C. Z.

Relationship Between Protein Nitrogen, Proteolytic, Amylolytic and Lipolytic Enzymes in Canine Pancreatic Juice Obtained Under Various Conditions of Stimulation

Paul H. Guth 1, S. A. Komarov 1, Harry Shay 1, and C. Zislin Style 1

1 From the Samuel S. Fels Research Institute, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Pancreatic secretion obtained from a dog with a permanent pancreatic fistula in response to each of four different kinds of test meals was analyzed for proteolytic, amylolytic and lipolytic activity with the view of studying possible correlation between the concentrations of the enzymes and protein nitrogen, and also possible effect of variation in composition of the test meals on these constituents. The enzyme activities were determined by phototurbidimetric methods, some of which were developed in this laboratory. Statistically significant deviations from proportionality between each of the enzymes and protein nitrogen, and also from the secretion of the enzymes in parallel concentrations occurred in specimens secreted in response to the same kind of test meal with day-to-day variation being the main contributing factor. With the exception of the relationship between amylase and protein nitrogen, deviations from enzyme-protein nitrogen proportionality and from the parallel secretion of the enzymes in specimens secreted in response to different test meals were not significantly greater than the daily variations which occurred in response to the same type of test meal. All these variations did not conform with any of the following widely held theories: a) proportionality between each of the enzymes and protein nitrogen, b) secretion of all enzymes in parallel concentrations regardless of composition of the test meal, and lastly c) purposive adaptation of concentrations of individual enzymes to the kind of food ingested. No evidence elucidating the physiologic mechanism of the variations observed was obtained.

Submitted on May 14, 1956







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1956 by the American Physiological Society.