AJP Legacy AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol 185: 217-229, 1956;
0002-9513/56 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelfan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tarlov, I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelfan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tarlov, I. M.

Physiology of Spinal Cord, Nerve Root and Peripheral Nerve Compression

Samuel Gelfan 1 and I. M. Tarlov 1

1 From the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, New York Medical College, New York City

The reversible conduction block produced by maintained mechanical pressure around small segments of spinal cord, nerve root or peripheral nerve (dog) is due to mechanical deformation of the neuronal tissue and not to lack of O2. The compressed segment, although ischemic, is not anoxic; O2 from adjacent nonischemic tissue reaches it, presumably by diffusion. The entire pattern of modification of neuronal responses by compression and the postdecompression recovery pattern are distinctly different from the patterns observed during anoxia and recovery from the latter, indicating the difference in mechanisms by which mechanical deformation and O2 lack block conduction. The largest fibers in dorsal columns, roots and peripheral nerves are most susceptible to pressure and the smallest ones are relatively most resistant. Secondary neurons are less vulnerable than the primary afferent ones to light and moderate, but suprasystolic, circumferential spinal cord pressure. All components of the composite spinal cord potential are blocked at about the same time by larger compressive forces. Anoxia, on the other hand, always inactivates secondary neurons before dorsal column fibers and blocks smaller A fibers in peripheral nerves before the larger ones. The latency for complete blocking in each neuronal structure is specific and irreducible in the case of anoxia, whereas in compression it varies over a wide range, depending upon the magnitude of the compressive force.

Submitted on September 16, 1955







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1956 by the American Physiological Society.